Home| Letters| Links| RSS| About Us| Contact Us

On the Frontline

What's New

Table of Contents

Index of Authors

Index of Titles

Index of Letters

Mailing List


subscribe to our mailing list:



SECTIONS

Critique of Intelligent Design

Evolution vs. Creationism

The Art of ID Stuntmen

Faith vs Reason

Anthropic Principle

Autopsy of the Bible code

Science and Religion

Historical Notes

Counter-Apologetics

Serious Notions with a Smile

Miscellaneous

Letter Serial Correlation

Mark Perakh's Web Site

Letters

[Write a Reply] [Letters Index]

Title Author Date
Does not the creationist's argument refute itself? TalkReason , Jan 04, 2009
Dear David Mayer:

We find your argument reasonable.

Talk Reason
Related Articles: The Fine-Tuned Universe -- the insignificance of very small numbers

Title Author Date
Does not the creationist's argument refute itself? Frank, Mark Jan 07, 2009
David

My concern was only with that one specific error.

I guess the creationist is trying to point out a problem with a naturalist model of the universe. So considerations of what an omnipotent deity can achieve are not essential to the (invalid) argument. We all know that once the big G is invoked can be done.
Related Articles: The Fine-Tuned Universe -- the insignificance of very small numbers